AI master data management
across every system you run

A wrong VAT number does not stay a wrong VAT number. It rides out on every invoice raised against that customer until somebody notices, three weeks later. One golden record per customer, supplier and article, kept in step everywhere it lives.

Invalid work email
Row of white trucks parked at a lit distribution centre beside a motorway at dusk

What does AI master data management do?

An AI agent keeps one golden record per customer, supplier and article, and every copy of it in step across your systems. Each change is validated where it happens, such as a VAT number against the register, and every field carries its lineage. Clear-cut fixes sync on their own; anything touching money, rights or a merge waits for its owner.

01

Data sync

One golden record per customer, supplier and article, and every system holding a copy of it kept in step. Where two copies disagree, your survivorship rules decide which value wins. Where the rules cannot settle it, a steward does.

02

Compliance checks

Validation runs on the change itself, not on a data quality report circulated a month later. A VAT number checked against the register, a credit limit against policy, a mandatory field that is genuinely mandatory. The record does not move until it passes.

03

Audit trail

Lineage on every field: which system the value came from, who changed it, when, and on whose authority. Written as it happens rather than reconstructed the week an auditor asks, and readable by a person rather than a database.

Glass jars moving along a conveyor on a food production line

Every system tells the same story.

When one record is kept in step everywhere it lives, orders stop failing on an old address and payments stop bouncing on stale bank details. Every agent downstream works from data you can trust.

Learn more
Data deskMaster data health
Live
ERPCRMWebshopPIM
Customers
Suppliers
Articles
Prices
Contacts
AgreesDriftedNot held
99.6%of 14,208 records agree across 4 systems▲ 1.8 pts this month
Waiting on Finance · Supplier 2291 · bank details
ERP · changed todayNL20 •••• 4567
CRM · since 2023NL91 •••• 4300
Keep ERPKeep CRMBank details never change without the owner

One record, disagreeing across two systems.

The same customer exists in SAP and in Salesforce, and the two records no longer agree. Somebody changed one of them and did not change the other.

Master data sweepEvery morning, 06:00
0records checked across six systems
23 disagreeand one of them is about to cost you three weeks of invoices
What that one field already touchedTechniVorm · VAT ID
4Open orders carrying the wrong VATnot yet invoiced
2Invoices already issuedwill be rejected
1Credit check run on the bad recorddecision stands
Proposed to the data owner, with both records side by sideawaiting approval
Lleverage
Master data agent AI coworker · Lleverage
Online
You flagged 23 this morning. Which one is urgent?
Lleverage
This one. TechniVorm’s VAT ID, and it has already been used.
Data sync check Salesforce · SAP
Working In sync
Salesforce
Salesforce Scanning
SAP
SAP Scanning
TechniVorm 0 records compared
Salesforce
VAT ID
NL8123.45.678B01
SAP
VAT ID
NL8132.45.678B01 NL8123.45.678B01
≠
Salesforce is right. SAP has been wrong since 14 May.
Approved. TechniVorm is corrected in all six systems and the change is logged. The other 22 are queued the same way.
Human in the loop

You decide which fields need their owner

Every field has an owner and a rule. Clear-cut fixes sync to every system on their own, and anything that touches money, rights or a merge waits for the person who owns that field.

01Who owns which fieldFinance owns payment terms, sales owns contacts. You write it down once.
02Checked where the change happensVAT, duplicates and formats before the record spreads.
03Some fields never change on their ownBank details, credit limits and permissions always go to their owner.
Supplier 2291 · Brandsma Bouw5 fields changed
AddressKeizersgracht 12, AmsterdamAgent · synced
Phone+31 20 555 0192Agent · synced
VAT numberNL8591 ••• B01Agent · checked
Bank detailsNL20 •••• 4567Person · Finance
Credit limitEUR 40,000 → 60,000Person · Credit control
The agent handles itGoes to a person

Our engineers set it up with you.
It takes on more of the data work as it learns.

Forward deployed engineers clean the first domain with your data owners, so the corrections come off the desk in the first weeks rather than at the end of a project. From there it automates gradually: every decision teaches it which system owns which field, and fewer records need a person to look.

Invalid work email
A busy operations office with people working at their desks
The FDE model Forward deployed engineers, with you for the first domain and for every one after.

They work inside your operation. They map every system that holds a copy with your data owners, set the confidence line together, and stay on as systems are added. Not a licence and a manual. A team that knows your records.

If you preferSame agents Self-served Your own data team builds it in Lleverage.

The system connections, the ownership rules, the validations and the log are yours to configure. Our documentation and support sit behind your team, and an engineer is a call away whenever you want one.

Talk to us about either ↗
Koninklijke Dekker
“Since we implemented this solution with Lleverage we particularly see an improvement in our data quality, not only in our inside sales department but also in our manufacturing and logistics department. We simply see that we make fewer mistakes and can work more accurately.”
3 departments on cleaner data:
sales, manufacturing, logistics
Mart Kruidenier Continuous Improvement, Koninklijke Dekker
Stacks of sawn timber in a covered timber yard at dusk, a forklift at the end of the aisle

Questions about AI master data management.

Which value wins when two systems disagree?

Your survivorship rules decide. You write down once who owns which field, for example finance owns payment terms and sales owns contacts. Clear-cut differences are then fixed in every system on their own, and where the rules cannot settle it, the data steward who owns that field makes the call.

What is checked before a record changes?

Validation runs on the change itself, not in a data quality report a month later: a VAT number against the register, a credit limit against policy, duplicates, formats and fields that are genuinely mandatory. The record does not move on to the other systems until every one of those checks has passed.

Which fields never change without a person?

Bank details, credit limits and permissions always go to their owner, however confident the agent is, and so does anything that touches money, rights or a merge of two records. Every change is written to an audit trail: which system the value came from, who changed it, when and on whose authority.

Which systems does it keep in step?

Your ERP, such as SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Finance and Operations, Exact, AFAS or Infor, and the systems around it that hold a copy of the same record, such as a CRM like Salesforce. Nothing is migrated into a new database: every system keeps its own record, and those records are kept in step.

How long does it take to go live?

Forward deployed engineers clean the first domain with your data owners and map every system that holds a copy, so corrections come off the desk in the first weeks rather than at the end of a project. Every decision teaches it which system owns which field, and fewer records need a person.

Give your back office an AI workforce.